The Death of the Craftsman

Frameworks with Carl Hardwick | CoachRx Podcast Network

Watch on YouTube

Listen on Spotify

Frameworks, Episode 46, with Carl Hardwick and James FitzGerald

"It takes me too long to write training programs." "I don't have experience in this area and I need experience right now so I can coach these people." "There are people on social media who look so much smarter than me, who speak so much more articulately than I do, and they grab more attention."

Carl heard all three of those in one lecture last week. They were offered up as personal downfalls, listed by working coaches as evidence that something was wrong with them. What Carl actually heard was three coaches in a hurry, measuring themselves against a finish line they had not earned the right to stand near yet. So he took it to James, and this episode is the result. Tactician to craftsman to master: where the framework came from, what each stage actually feels like from the inside, and why the craftsman may be quietly disappearing from the fitness industry. Not because coaches stopped wanting to be good. Because the timeline required to get there no longer fits the culture we coach inside of.

Imposter syndrome is a judgment problem, not a knowledge problem

The lecture conversation started with imposter syndrome, and Carl's read on it is worth sitting with before anything else.

"I believe imposter syndrome is just you being afraid that someone's going to judge you as harshly as you judge yourself."

That reframe matters, because it moves the problem. If imposter syndrome were a knowledge problem, more information would fix it. Another certification, another course, another weekend. But if it is a judgment problem, no amount of downloading touches it. You are not short on knowledge. You are short on time, and you are punishing yourself for a gap that time is the only thing that closes.

Carl's answer to the room was not a resource list. It was this: calm down, relax, be patient, and go from being a tactician to earning the right to call yourself a craftsman.

The technician knows that they do not know

James picked up the framework around the year 2000, from his mentor Bernie Nowakowski, and he is quick to point out the lineage. George Leonard wrote Mastery years before that, and people have been talking about mastery in one phrase of knowledge or another for a very long time. Nothing here is new. What Bernie did was put mastery into a principled, fundamental, systematic form that could travel across any industry, and that is what made it useful.

One note on language: Carl opened with "tactician," and James said technician is actually the better word. Both get used. Technician is the more accurate one.

The technician does not know, and they know that they do not know. That awareness is the entry requirement, not a weakness.

This is the stage where you are in the trenches doing a large volume of work. Learning constantly. Downloading and downloading and downloading. Certifications every weekend, all the books, magazines, clinical journals, whatever seminar was on offer. For James it was the bodybuilding.com and T Nation forums, back when Mel Siff was posting and you could just get in there. You are still doing the job the whole time, still operating under the Hippocratic obligation of not hurting people and moving them forward.

But there is one thing the technician cannot do. When the client asks what is best for me, you cannot answer with certainty. You can answer. You cannot answer with certainty. That is not a character flaw. That is what the stage is.

The craftsman earns the right to say it out loud

Then, after enough time, something shifts. You have now done enough that you can recognize principles. Sorting through everything you accumulated during the technician years, things start to synthesize and make sense for general program design and general consultation practices. And you find yourself saying something new: this is now my own way of synthesizing this material.

So you do know some things now. You also still know that you do not know everything. Both are true at once, and holding both is the craftsman's actual skill.

James tells this stage through a story he used to tell in the CCP class, the one that used to get his lip quivering. He is at a conference, walking among the civilians, and he gets in the elevator. Someone asks, out of pure curiosity, so what's your job?

And he says, I'm a strength coach.

That is the whole story. What made it a milestone was that he said it clearly enough that he meant it. He meant it in his heart. He meant it in his soul. At the craftsman level, it is finally time where you can say the thing and mean it. As James put it, you are set free. This is my way. This is the way I'm going to do it.

That emotional marker is part of the framework, not decoration on top of it. Coaches who are rushing are trying to feel that feeling on a schedule.

The master sees the forest floor beneath the trees

Mastery, in James's description, is a circle. You start understanding all the principles involved and what truths sit inside those principles. Then you go past your own system. You start synthesizing across all systems and finding the truths in them. And then, secondarily, you start teaching others the principles of the entire journey.

Which brings you back around. A snake eating its tail. You fall back in love with being able to teach a five-year-old something real about physical expression and choices and behaviors, because you could teach that same thing to the sixteen-year-old, the fifty-year-old, and the ninety-year-old. You understand the synthesis of the principles well enough that the audience stops being the constraint.

Carl's response to that was worth keeping in: "You are cognitively there today, James."

Where each stage sits on the competence ladder

Carl mapped the three stages onto the competence ladder while James was talking, and the overlay holds up.

Unconscious incompetence: the technician at the start. Conscious incompetence: still the technician, but on the way to craftsman, because now you understand what you do not understand and what it will take to get there. Conscious competence: the craftsman. Unconscious competence: the master.

James added one refinement. The craftsman sits in the middle of the four, and the middle is what he calls a weird ground. Because you do not want to be overly cocky about what you think you know, and you do not want to be dismissive about what you still do not. Conscious competence is the least comfortable of the four states, which is probably why so few people stay in it long enough to get through it.

The question has changed

Here is the diagnostic that makes this episode worth sending to another coach.

Carl pays attention to the questions people ask, because the question tells you where someone is trying to go. Years ago, the question he heard, and the question he asked himself, was: how do I get better? How do I get better? How do I get better?

The question that has replaced it is: how do I grow faster? How do I scale?

Put those two side by side. Carl's follow-up to the room is the whole point of the episode: well, don't you want to be great at what you do first? And the honest answer he sometimes gets back is no, I just want to grow faster and I want to scale. He calls the claim hyperbolic on purpose. Not every coach has lost the desire. But it is a trend, and it runs one direction. More scale questions. Fewer better questions.

James's read was slightly different, and more precise. He is not convinced the desire is gone. Every coach who ever sat in front of him with this framework seemed to genuinely want to partake in that long-term progressive goal. What he is less sure about is whether the thing itself still exists. Capital T true craftsmen, in his words, may not exist anymore, or not nearly as much of them.

The reason is a number. James puts the top of the craftsman role at possibly fifteen to twenty years. It takes a lifetime to become a life coach. Now put that number next to the current state of fitness, where anyone can be a coach, anyone can find the answer to anything within seconds, and there are machines that can pump out a program design better than a technician's program design. Add the attention economy. That is why James calls it a post-fitness world. There are no truths anymore.

Nobody says: I can't wait to get to my thirteenth year of coaching before I have the aha moments to say, man, I'm a fitness coach.

Humans still take nine months to have a baby

The unsexy answer to how do I get better is the one nobody wants written on a slide. You do it a lot. You get reps. You keep gaining experience. You work under people you respect. You ask questions of people whose life and practice look like where you want to be someday.

Carl has watched rooms react to that answer in real time, and it splits. Some people's shoulders drop. They are relieved. They were stressed about something they did not need to be stressed about, and now they know they are on the right track and just need to keep digging. Other people want the hack. How do I get program design from fifteen minutes down to five so I can scale faster.

Carl includes himself in the second group, which is what makes him credible on it. His brain works that way. He spent years trying to find the efficiencies and build the systems, and he still has to catch himself and remember that it is going to take time, and that the good things come from giving it the time and being consistent rather than doing things ad hoc.

James is empathetic to the coaches asking. It makes sense. Everything around them moves fast, and fitness is a commodity because we are downstream from culture. But then he puts down the line that settles the argument.

Humans still take nine months to have a baby.

There are human principles that do not bend to your vision of how fast things should move and progress. You cannot get pregnant quicker. You cannot get the reps quicker. You can stand up and say you truly believe that lifting weights under absolute strength and then doing easy aerobic work is the answer for a lot of people, and you may or may not be right. But as James puts it, only after twelve years will I listen to that person.

The craftsman got replaced by the creator

This is the sharpest turn in the conversation.

Carl's read is that the urge to be a craftsman has largely been replaced by the urge to be a creator. And he draws the two side by side.

The craftsman: I want to close the door and get really good at what I'm doing, and I don't care who understands how good I am, because I'm doing this for myself.

The creator: I need everyone to understand how good I am at this thing.

James agreed, and traced how it happened. Coaches always created. Create is one of the four in teach, learn, move, create. But they created because they wanted to help people, and because they wanted to see the process inside that artistic creation. It is artistic precisely because it is individualized. Only that one person will benefit from it.

And then the part that lands: "we never, in that creation process, said, I wonder what everyone else is going to think about that."

Now coaches have been told they have to be a creator, and then told they have to show everyone their creation. So they conclude they are judged by their creation. Which is exactly where imposter syndrome comes from, and exactly where some coaches stop entirely.

James's alternative is almost aggressively small. Just do Nancy's program. Tell Nancy she does not need to show anyone what she did in her program. You do not need to show anyone what you gave her. She needs to keep getting better and you need to make sure she keeps getting better. That is it. Wipe your hands clean and sleep well at night, because you did that eight times on a Tuesday and it felt good. That is the heart of create in teach, learn, move, create. Creation for creation's sake.

Which is what pulled Carl's best line out of him: don't spend the next five years of your life trying to convince people that you're an expert. Spend the next five years of your life being closer to actually being an expert.

The master does not aim for simple. The coach should.

Carl noticed something in his own notes on the three stages. As knowledge grows across technician, craftsman, and master, so does your ability to make things unbelievably complex. And yet the intention seems to move the other way, toward simpler.

James pushed back on the word aim. He does not think the master aims to simplify. It just becomes easier for them to see the forest floor beneath the trees. He said outright that he considers himself a master in coaching, and then said he ended up there without that being the goal. He can say something to the four-year-old working out in his yard that sticks, and he is fairly confident he could hand that same language to a thirty-three-year-old coach. It is simple. There is a lot behind it.

Carl's position is that in fitness coaching specifically, coaches should aim to simplify. At the end of the day it actually is simple, and it has to be simple to help the person in front of you. He does it deliberately in every lecture: he goes intentionally too far into the verbiage and the complexity, and then at the end he says, now let's talk about why none of that really matters. Then he simplifies it down to something the coach can actually say to Nancy tonight, connected to her goals, her health, her energy. Coaches get the back room. Nancy gets the front room.

James framed the reason better than the word simplicity does. The point is not simple for its own sake. The point is that it is easy to download, so the client moves toward autonomy, sovereignty, and independence. That is why you say chew thirty-two instead of running seven minutes on mucus and saliva and breakdown. Chew thirty-two is simple, memorable, a little funny, and it rhymes. It also works.

Carl connects this to something he has been saying internally: he hates gatekeeping, there are very few gatekeepers left anyway, and simplifying is how you actively tear that down. James's version, which he has been saying for years, is the power grabs from the fitness industrial complex.

Privacy over pride

Carl closed on an article he read that morning about the benefits of telling the truth when you do not want to, and what happens in the prefrontal cortex when you want to do something and then you do not do it. Not delayed gratification. Just not doing it.

He applied it somewhere uncomfortable. Coaches have a deep desire to share their clients' progress with the world, and Carl is careful to say he is not claiming it is wrong every time a coach does it. But consider what happens when the breakthrough stays between the two of you. Body composition, strength, consistency, something that client has worked very hard for and now wants to celebrate with you. Something happens in your prefrontal cortex when you want to broadcast that and you keep it private instead. And you teach your client something in the process.

James had two answers for that. The first: lose with dignity, win with humility.

The second was a phrase he wrote on the gym whiteboard post-COVID and left up there for a while, born out of what he calls his hatred for what he was watching happen in the fitness universe at the time.

Privacy over pride.

He is not using pride in the theological sense. Sometimes there are positive intentions inside being proud of your work. His point is that the work should still be personal to Nancy, and private to Nancy, and even when it is not private to her, you want her to understand that it is a private and personal affair. She does not need to tell the world about her progress and where it came from. He knows every objection, because people are thinking marketing and Instagram and everything that goes with it. He gets it. The phrase stands anyway.

What to actually do about it

Carl asked James directly: what can coaches do to bring the concept of working toward mastery back? Between the two of them, this is the list.

From James. Pause, recollect, and reflect without emotion on the years involved across technician, craftsman, and master. Then take the concepts you already have and overlay them: maximum physical potential, the beginner, intermediate, advanced progression, light theory and how many reps it takes for a central nervous system to light up. Lay all of that on top of the reps needed by you, the coach, across the same three stages. You do not have to do anything with it. What you should not do is fire back that you do not have time for that. Hold your horses. Sit with the truth that humans progress at specific rates and have real constraints, then bring that back to time in the trenches and falling in love with it. Stop caring what other people think about the time you set aside to learn. Think about how fun the craftsman stage is going to be. Hold the ideal of a career where you can call yourself a master, where you sleep well at night, where you can look back on thousands of consultations and tens of thousands of designs and still say simple things to people on the street. Then go back to your life and your job, and patiently work toward that.

From Carl. Coach more. Study principles. Find mentors. Actually reflect. Calm down. Pay attention. Always be assessing. Stop rushing. Connect to the long game, whatever that means for you. If you are thirty-two today, spend some time on what you want sixty-eight to look like. Information will keep getting cheaper, so the real question becomes how you jockey for position in an era where information is cheap and the gatekeepers are being torn down. The answer is wisdom, and wisdom comes from doing all of the above. The world is getting faster. Move with it where you need to, and adopt the things that genuinely help. But as the world gets faster, ask how you go deeper.

James's point is that this is now countercultural, and he means it literally. Slowing down is countercultural. Understanding principles is countercultural. Not caring what other people think is deeply countercultural. Which is why it comes back to the B in BEN, the relationship between you and the client. All of it happens inside consultations and inside relationship building. You are committing to a deeper relationship with one person for a long stretch, and you fall in love with that whole process.

You also accept that they will come back and say they just heard twenty-seven different things since you last spoke. So you be diligent and forthcoming and tell it again in a way that might stick. Chew thirty-two. Sunshine. Drink water. Patterns. Pacing. They might get it. They might not, and then you are forgiving and you repeat it. There is hope and faith in the process because you cannot control it. James is uncertain about that human's progress, but he will feel better if he tries his darndest for two years to let them download the information so they can become autonomous and do things for themselves.

Which is the whole framework in one sentence, applied to you instead of your client.

Don't spend the next five years of your life trying to convince people that you're an expert. Spend the next five years of your life being closer to actually being an expert.

Frameworks is part of the CoachRx Podcast Network, alongside Marketing for Fitness Coaches and Behind The Design. New episodes weekly.

If the technician stage is where you are, and you want the principles rather than more information, the OPEX Method Mentorship is the ten-week system for installing them. The next cohort starts October 13. Book a strategy call with a coaching advisor who has been through the program.

Listen to Episode 46 Now

▶️ Watch on YouTube
🎧 Listen on Spotify
📖 Catch up on past episodes + blog recaps

Have questions?

DM Carl on Instagram @hardwickcarl

Frameworks is part of the CoachRx Podcast Network, your hub for principled, purpose-driven coaching conversations.

For more shows, visit:coachrx.app/podcast-network

Stay ahead of the curve and provide the best for your clients with CoachRx.

Start Your 14-Day Free Trial!

Next
Next

Lifestyle Prescription with OPEX Coaches Daniel Persson and Brandon Gallagher